There is No Man Made atmosphere emergency (Global Warming is a Hoax)

The mainstream media has got a very large measure of the habitancy duped into believing that humans have caused some sort of climate urgency (global warming) and that paying new emissions taxes will somehow fix all that is wrong with the world. This "crisis" is precisely the most scam of all time and is based on bad science. It is a excellent Problem/Reaction/Solution that is being used to line the pockets of fat cat "environmentalists" and supplementary enslave humanity. In this article I will elucidate why the so called "climate crisis" is fallacy and nothing to worry about, who is behind it, and why you should refuse to pay a tax on living/breathing.

In the mainstream media it appears as though the "global warming" debate is over. We are facing a great problem, our carbon dioxide emissions have caused Earth's temperature to rise and if we don't do something to stop it right now we will face great cataclysmic events. The polar ice caps will melt, our ocean levels will rise and displace hundreds of millions of people, species will go extinct, and humanity will be brought to its knees. The truth is that what is presented to us as scientifically proven fact in the mainstream is still hotly contested by tens of thousands of the world's top scientists, and no real debate has even been done. Today you receive dumbfounded looks or worse if you even begin to question the validity of the idea that man made global warming exists and is caused by Co2 emissions. More likely you are ridiculed and possibly even considered to be suffering from a reasoning disorder when you present such a blasphemous question. Global warming has advanced an approximately religious, or cult-like following in the years since Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth was produced and marketed through the mainstream media and was sent to schools as part of a new curriculum to indoctrinate our youth into the new religion of "climate change". Suddenly and without debate, a pseudo-scientific ideas became fact approximately over night. To this day Al Gore and his fellow fear-mongering "environmentalists" refuse any sort of debate on the branch and proclaim that it is just too urgent to waste time debating something so silly when what we need to do is focus on the solution. A clarification which just happens to make Al Gore very rich. If global warming caused by man made carbon dioxide emissions is such a silly thing to debate, why don't they just do the debate and get it over with? Why won't Al Gore and other alarmists debate the issue? I imagine the imagine they will not engage in the debate is because they are wrong, and debating it would prove them so. John Coleman, founder of The Weather Channel, along with over 30,000 other scientists are now trying to sue Al Gore for fraud. They feel that since the mainstream media will not cover both sides of the story, there is no other way to get the issue looked at seriously, so they are taking it to the courts.

It is evident that the climate on earth is precisely changing, but the climate on earth is all the time changing and humans have very puny influence over it. A professor by the name of Nir Shaviv from the make of Physics at the University of Jerusalem discovered that there have been periods in earth's history where there was up to ten times as much carbon dioxide in the climate as there is now, yet it had next to no impact on earth's temperature. Professer Ian Clark of the division of Earth Sciences at the University of Ottowa is quoted saying "If we look at climate from the geological timeframe we would never imagine Co2 as a major climate driver. You can't say that Co2 will drive climate, it precisely never did in the past". Dr. Piers Corbyn, a weather forecaster who uses sunspots to predict weather patterns, said that Co2 does not elucidate any past weather patterns. Professor Patrick Michaels of the division of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia has said that "anyone who goes around and says that carbon dioxide is responsible for most of the warming of the 20th century hasn't looked at the basic numbers". One main imagine that some habitancy believe Co2 causes warming is the results of ice core surveys that can measure earth temperatures over hundreds of thousands of years. In Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth it is said that for 650,000 years the ice core surveys show correlation between Co2 and temperature. "When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer". While the ice core surveys precisely do show that Co2 and warming seem to go together, Al Gore and his team make an incorrect assumption when they state that it is the Co2 that causes the warming. Professor Ian Clark says that Al Gore's team got it backwards, and that the warming precisely causes the Co2. The ice core samples show that the warming leads the Co2 by about 800 years which means it could not possibly be the Co2 causing the temperature to change. Clark says that carbon dioxide is a goods of temperature, not the other way around, and that wholly destroys the fundamentals of the ideas behind "global warming".

If it's not Co2 that's behind climate change, then what is causing all this apparent warming (we are precisely in a cooling period, more on that later) that is melting the polar ice caps and raising sea levels? I know this might sound crazy so I'm just going to throw this idea out there for you to chew on for a bit... Could it possibly be the sun? When Dr. Sami Solanki, director of the Max Planck make for Solar ideas explore in Germany analyzed sunspot cycles and compared them to temperatures on earth, he found it stunningly definite that when there are more solar flares, also known as sunspots, the temperature goes up to reflect the increase in solar activity. It's not only more heat from the sun that causes warming, cosmic rays interacting with water vapour generate clouds which result the temperature of earth. When there is strong solar radiation (more sunspots), fewer solar ray particles get through to the earth, resulting in fewer clouds. When there are fewer clouds, more solar heat is able to get through. When learning cosmic ray and temperature records going back up to six million years, you will find that when there is less solar radiation there are more cloud-forming cosmic rays, and temperatures go down. When solar radiation increases you will find that the temperature goes up, every particular time. I have included a graph on my blog which shows the relationship between cosmic-rays and cloud cover, and someone else graph showing the relationship between sunspots and global temperature. Whatever with half a brain should be able to see that the sun is obviously the driving factor when it comes to the temperature on earth.

Often we are told that our planet is warmer now than ever before in recorded history. What they forget to mention is that "recorded history" means somewhere between 1860 and 1914. Our planet has been through many cycles, some chronic tens or hundreds of thousands of years, so are records from only 150 years ago precisely all that meaningful? explore by a study team at Harvard University showed that we have had much higher temperatures in the last thousand years, and we are not at an extreme at whether end of the spectrum. between the 9th and 14th centuries the temperatures were much warmer than today and in the 15th century there was the beginning of the "Little Ice Age" during which many rivers and waterways iced over and habitancy had to adapt to the cooler temperatures. We are currently not even in a warm duration when compared to the last 60 years or so we are precisely in a cooling phase. Below is a graph which shows the current cooling trend. Modern news reports show that 2008 was the coldest year in the last century, with many countries reporting article amounts of snow in places that don't commonly get any. You might find it funny to know that The International organization for Global Warming had to postpone last years discussion due to an unexpected blizzard and article breaking cold weather. These climate changes are natural, ever-present, and are nothing to be afraid of.

Even if carbon dioxide was causing warming of our earth, carbon taxes would not be a clarification to the problem. Paying carbon taxes to fight carbon dioxide emissions would be about as sufficient as trying to fix a car that won't start by changing the rear wheel. Carbon taxes are a sick trick being played on the group by a group of greedy scam artists. Paying a tax makes the environment better? Since when? Even if that tax money went to pay habitancy to plant trees or invest in renewable power explore and amelioration (which it doesn't) it would not likely make a noticeable or great dissimilarity to the betterment of our environment or our ability to sustain a non-changing climate. But since Co2 is not behind climate change at all, there is precisely no imagine that any person should pay taxes on carbon emissions. If such carbon tax legislation ever does pass, I hope that every person will stand together in protest of them and refuse to pay such ludicrous fees.

Many will accuse habitancy who have done explore into the global warming scam to be anti-environment, encouraging pollution, supporting big oil, or a plethora of other things. I personally have been accused of "enjoying toxic air pollution and supporting the scourge of cancer" after speaking out about the truth behind the whole man made climate change scam. For some reason, which I imagine might be television and mainstream media mind programming, habitancy make a relationship that links habitancy who are skeptical of man made global warming ("climate change deniers") to encouraging pollution. To make this perfectly clear, there is no such connection. Co2 isn't causing temperature changes but that doesn't mean you should run your car more often or quit recycling. I am in full sustain of exploring new clean renewable power sources and good waste administration and disposal.